Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carilli, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Malabanan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carilli, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Malabanan, S.
(Chest. 1974;66:472-477.)
© 1974 American College of Chest Physicians

The Flow-Volume Loop in Normal Subjects and in Diffuse Lung Disease

Albert D. Carilli M.D., F.C.C.P.1; Lawrence J. Denson M.D., F.C.C.P.2; Florence Rock M.D.2; and Servando Malabanan M.D.2

1 Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, New Jersey College of Medicine, Newark
2 Pulmonary Service and the Cardiopulmonary Laboratory, Hackensack Hospital, Hackensack, New Jersey

The maximum effort flow-volume (MFV) loops of 82 subjects were analyzed along with standard spirometric measurements. Thiry-eight were normal smokers and non-smokers. Nineteen had restrictive disease and 25 had obstructive disease. The means of the maximum expiratory and inspiratory flows at peak, and at 75, 50 and 25 percent VC with their ratios are determined for all groups. The location of PEF in the VC, PEF-MEF75/PEF percent and DgrV/DgrV over midexpiration are also given. MEF25 and MEF25/MIF25 were significantly lower in normal smokers than in nonsmokers. DgrV/DgrV was greater in the restrictive group. PEF occurred at lower lung volumes in restrictive disease and at higher volumes in obstructive disease. The obstructive group had low DgrV/Dgr V's and high PEF-MEF75/PEF percent, both correlating with FEV1/VC percent (r=.79 and -.81). MEF25/MIF25 correlated with percent decrease in dynamic compliance with increased frequency. Small airways obstruction was found when MEF25/MIF25le.3. The flow-volume loop provides a simple and rapid assessment of mechanical derangement of the lung.

Submitted on November 9, 1973
Accepted on May 15, 1974







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American College of Chest Physicians.