Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tashkin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tashkin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.

Chest, Vol 68, 155-161, Copyright © 1975 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Double-blind comparison of acute bronchial and cardiovascular effects of oral terbutaline and ephedrine

DP Tashkin, R Meth, DH Simmons and YE Lee

Acute effects of oral terbutaline (5 mg), ephedrine (25 mg) and placebo on bronchial dynamics, heart rate, systolic and diastolic pressure and arterial blood gases at rest were compared over a period of 7 hours in 20 subjects with bronchial asthma using a double-blind crossover technique. Both terbutaline and ephedrine caused significant bronchodilation, but the effect of terbutaline on specific airway conductance (SGA) was significantly greater (peak mean increase in SGA 0.069 vs 0.027 L/sec/cm H2O/L), had an earlier onset (30 minutes vs 1 hour) and lasted longer (7 hours vs 4 hours) than that of ephedrine. Slight but significant increases in arterial Po2 were noted following institution of both ephedrine and terbutaline, suggesting improvement in ventilation-perfusion relationships. Both drugs caused modest but statistically significant increases in heart rate of 8.4-10.9 beats/min and the mean peak increase following terbutaline (8.4 beats/min) was comparable to that following ephedrine. In constrast to ephedrine, terbutaline caused significant, although slight, increases in systolic pressure and decreases in diastolic pressure, indicating that this drug, in the dose recommended for clinical use, is not free of cardiovascular effects.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American College of Chest Physicians.