Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D. R.
(Chest. 1975;68:641-644.)
© 1975 American College of Chest Physicians

Ventricular Arrhythmias following Mitral Valve Replacement

Control with Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation

E. H. Williams M.D.1; G. F. O. Tyers M.D.1; S. L. Carter M.D.1; and D. R. Williams 1

1 From the Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pa.

Two patients with severe left ventricular failure (New York Heart Association's class 4) secondary to acute mitral insufficiency underwent mitral valve replacement after their condition had been stabilized by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. The need for hemodynamic support declined rapidly following valve replacement in both cases, but when the frequency of balloon counterpulsation was reduced, the immediate onset of life-threatening arrhythmias was noted. The resumption of 1:1 intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation always immediately abolished the arrhythmia. The dependency upon counterpulsation for arrhythmia suppression gradually diminished, and after a week the intra-aortic balloon was removed from the second patient, who subsequently made a complete recovery. The intra-aortic balloon was removed from the first patient four days after surgery and one day after its antiarrhythmic effect had been noted. Twenty-four hours later, this patient succumbed to a ventricular tachycardia which terminated in ventricular fibrillation. When no surgically correctable lesion is present, prolonged use of the intra-aortic balloon is recommended for all patients who develop ventricular or low nodal arrhythmias in response to decreasing the frequency of counterpulsation. As in our second patient, this will on occasion save a very high-risk patient.

Submitted on April 1, 2008
Accepted on May 20, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American College of Chest Physicians.