Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashutosh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ashutosh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R.
(Chest. 1975;68:645-650.)
© 1975 American College of Chest Physicians

Passive Spirometry Used to Evaluate Pulmonary Function in Patients Receiving Mechanical Assistance to Ventilation

Kumar Ashutosh M.D., F.C.C.P.1; J. Howland Auchincloss Jr. M.D.1; and Robert Gilbert M.D.1

1 From the Pulmonary Disease Section, Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY

A method for obtaining passive expiratory volume in one second (PEV1) and passive vital capacity (PVC) is described. These measurements require no patient cooperation and can be made on patients who are receiving mechanical assistance to ventilation (MAV). The PEV1 and PEV1/PVC% correlated with FEV1 and FEV1/FVC% obtained at the same time, and also where FEV1 and FEV1/FVC% were determined when the patients were not acutely ill. These measurements can be used to assess pulmonary function in patients who are too ill to perform active vital capacity maneuvers and are on respirators. The PEV1 and PEV1/PVC% can also be used to assess a patient's ability to stay off assisted ventilation for at least 24 hours. All seven patients in whom PEV1 was greater than 600 ml were successfully tried off MAV. Of 11 patients with a PEV1 of less than 500 ml, all except one continued to require MAV. Also, a trial of unassisted breathing was successful in 13 of the 19 patients with a PEV1/PVC% greater than 60 percent, while it failed in all the eight patients with a PEV1/PVC% of less than 60 percent.

Submitted on February 27, 2008
Accepted on April 4, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American College of Chest Physicians.