Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BARKER, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BARKER, W. H.
(Chest. 1941;7:195-205.)
© 1941 American College of Chest Physicians

The Treatment of Pulmonary Infections with Sulfanilamide, Sulfapyridine, and Sulfathiazole

W. HALSEY BARKER M.D.1

1 Baltimore, Maryland

(1) The sulfonamide drugs—sulfanilamide, sulfapyridine, and sulfathiazole—have been shown to be extremely valuable in the treatment of many types of pulmonary infections.

(2) The drug of choice in an individual case depends upon the etiology of the infection.

(3) In pneumonia or empyema due to the beta hemolytic streptococcus, sulfanilamide is the drug to be recommended. In lobar pneumonia and other pneumococcal infections, sulfapyridine has proven most effective, whereas for staphylococcal infections of the lungs and bloodstream sulfathiazole appears to be the most potent therapeutic agent available.

(4) The introduction of sulfapyridine therapy has resulted in a reduction in the case fatality rate of lobar pneumonia to below 10 per cent. About two-thirds of the pneumonia patients who would formerly have succumbed to their infection may now be expected to recover.

(5) Type-specific antipneumococcal serum should be administered in conjunction with sulfapyridine to all patients seriously ill with lobar pneumonia, especially if bacteremia be present, and in all severe cases of pneumonia complicating pregnancy.

(6) Sulfathiazole appears to be about as effective as sulfapyridine in the treatment of pneumococcal lobar pneumonia. The questionable slight therapeutic inferiority of sulfathiazole is more than balanced by the fact that this drug is much less likely to give rise to severe nausea and vomiting.

(7) Sulfapyridine or sulfathiazole is indicated in bronchopneumonia, post-operative pneumonia, and severe purulent bronchitis, particularly if a pneumococcus or staphylococcus be the causative agent.

(8) Sulfanilamide, sulfapyridine, and sulfathiazole all give rise to a variety of toxic effects, the most serious of which concern the hematopoietic system, and the urinary tract. Because of the danger of such toxic effects the patient receiving one or another of these drugs should be carefully supervised throughout the course of treatment. Such supervision should include observation of the patient by the physician, accurate recording of the temperature and pulse, determination of the hemoglobin level and leucocyte count at least every other day, and frequent urinalyses.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1941 by the American College of Chest Physicians.