Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grover, F.
Right arrow Articles by Trinkle, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grover, F.
Right arrow Articles by Trinkle, J.

Chest, Vol 75, 37-44, Copyright © 1979 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Effects of aortic balloon pumping during cardiopulmonary bypass on myocardial perfusion, metabolism, and contractility

FL Grover, JG Fewel, J Vinas, JJ Ghidoni, KV Arom, JB Norton Jr and JK Trinkle

This study was undertaken to determine if the production of pulsatile flow by the intra-aortic balloon pump during cardiopulmonary bypass has any beneficial effect on coronary flow, regional myocardial flow, myocardial metabolism, and left ventricular function. Thirty-six conditioned dogs were subjected to one hour of total normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. They were divided into the following five groups: (1) controls, beating heart and femoral inflow; (2) balloon, beating heart, and femoral inflow; (3) balloon, beating heart, and aortic inflow; (4) control, fibrillating heart and femoral inflow; and (5) balloon, fibrillating heart, and femoral inflow. Total coronary flow, left ventricular flow, coronary sinus flow, and the endocardial- to-epicardial flow ratio increased in group 3. This increase in flow may have been in part due to increased resistance to flow in the descending aorta by the balloon. No differences in flow were noted in the other groups, all of which were perfused via the femoral artery. No significant differences in myocardial metabolism or left ventricular contractility could be demonstrated between balloon-treated and control groups in these normal hearts.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American College of Chest Physicians.