Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, R.
Right arrow Articles by Frater, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Becker, R.
Right arrow Articles by Frater, R.

Chest, Vol 75, 314-319, Copyright © 1979 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Surgery for mitral valve endocarditis

RM Becker, W Frishman and RW Frater

The records of 20 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement for complications of bacterial endocarditis were reviewed. Although the indications for surgery were the same as those for patients with aortic endocarditis, major emboli (cerebral, coronary or retinal) prompted surgery in 8 of 20 patients, a much higher incidence than reported for surgery in aortic valve endocarditis. Eighteen of the patients had mitral regurgitation; 14 of these had severe congestive heart failure, but the development of congestive failure tended to be more insidious than in patients with aortic endocarditis. Continued septicemia despite appropriate antibiotics was the least common indication for surgery. Sixteen of the 20 patients were salvaged by surgery, although some had major residual deficits, related mainly to preoperative emboli. These results are a marked improvement in the expected 90-100 percent mortality rate for patients with these complications of endocarditis. The main reason for a poor result following surgery was temporization leading to continued deterioration of vital functions preoperatively. Reinfection of the prosthesis did not occur, and we do not consider duration of preoperative antibiotic therapy an important factor in the decision to perform surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
G Doukas, M Oc, C Alexiou, A W Sosnowski, N J Samani, and T J Spyt
Mitral valve repair for active culture positive infective endocarditis
Heart, March 1, 2006; 92(3): 361 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. D. Muehrcke, D. M. Cosgrove III, B. W. Lytle, P. C. Taylor, A. M. Burgar, C. P. Durnwald, and F. D. Loop
Is There an Advantage to Repairing Infected Mitral Valves?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1997; 63(6): 1718 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American College of Chest Physicians.