Chest, Vol 75, 592-596, Copyright © 1979 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Electrophysiologic study of the left ventricle: indications and safety

EL Michelson, SR Spielman, AM Greenspan, A Farshidi, LN Horowitz and ME Josephson

Eighty patients (69 with documented or suspected recurrent ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, ten with left bundle-branch block, and one with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) underwent both right ventricular and left ventricular programmed electrical stimulation, including ventricular pacing and the introduction of one or two ventricular extrastimuli or electrode catheter mapping of the left ventricle (or both). Left ventricular catheters were introduced precutaneously via the femoral artery (of 61 patients, one required secondary repair) or via brachial arteriotomy (of 19 patients, two required secondary repair). All patients received an intravenously administered bolus of hep arin (5,000 units) following the insertion of the left ventricular catheter and then 1,000 units/hr after the first hour of study. No patients had cerebrovascular, systemic thromboembolic, or cardiac sequelae. In four (12 percent) of 34 patients with inductible ventricular tachycardia, programmed electrical stimulation of the left ventricle was required for initiation. Extensive left ventricular endocardial mapping was performed in 45 patients. Our experience suggests that (1) electrophysiologic study of the left ventricle can be performed safely, (2) programmed electrical stimulation of the left ventricle is indicated when a suspected ventricular tachyarrhythmia cannot be induced from the right ventricle, and (3) endocardial mapping of the left ventricle is indicated when surgery is being considered to abolish recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia.