Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demling, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Will, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demling, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Will, J. A.

Chest, Vol 76, 448-452, Copyright © 1979 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Relation between pulmonary transvascular fluid filtration rate and measured Starling's forces after major burn

RH Demling, M Manohar and JA Will

Our purpose was to determine the reliability of the currently used measurements of pulmonary vascular hydrostatic and oncotic pressures in monitoring pulmonary water after a major burn. The flow of pulmonary lymph, a reliable indicator of the rate of filtration of pulmonary transvascular fluid (Qf), was measured before and for 72 hours after a third-degree burn over 40 to 55 percent of the total body surface in sheep. Changes in Qf were correlated with measured changes in pulmonary microvascular (Pmv), plasma colloid osmotic pressure (pi p), and interstitial colloid osmotic pressure (pi i), as measured in the pulmonary lymph. The periods from 0 to 24 hours (resuscitation), from 24 to 48 hours (early mobilization of fluid), and from 48 to 72 hours (early recovery) were compared with baseline. Regression equations and correlation coefficients for Qf vs Pmv, Qf vs Pmv minus pi p, and Qf vs Pmv minus (pi p -ph i), the oncotic gradient, were calculated. There were significant differences in slopes between the periods of time, with all three comparisons indicating that the response of the microcirculation to the same changes in pressure was different in each of the periods. The correlation between Qf and the comparisons of pressures was clearly best in the period from 48 to 72 hours. The comparison of Pmv minus pi p was not better than Pmv alone, while the comparison of Pmv minus the gradient (pi p -- pi i) was significantly better than either of the other comparisons in predicting Qf.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American College of Chest Physicians.