Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zavala, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bedell, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zavala, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bedell, G.

Chest, Vol 79, 512-515, Copyright © 1981 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Teh response to atropine sulfate given by aerosol and intramuscular routes to patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy

DC Zavala, K Godsey and GN Bedell

Two groups of 11 patients each were studied in their responses to intramuscular (IM) or aerosolized atropine sulfate, given in preparation for fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The patients in group 1 received 1.0 mg of atropine IM, and those in group 2 were given a prepared solution of atropine in saline (5 mg/ml) at a dosage of 0.1 mg/kg by nebulization (IPPB). Statistical analysis of the FVC, FEV1, FEF25-75%, and FEFmax showed excellent protective bronchodilatory effects of both IM and aerosolized atropine. In fact, the beneficial result was more prolonged when the drug was administered by inhalation. One possible factor to consider, however, is that atropine given by the aerosol route did not inhibit the vasovagal response in three of the 11 patients. Another factor to take into account is that atropine by IM injection is quicker to administer, more convenient, and requires less instrumentation than atropine given by aerosol.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Stolz, V. Pollak, P. N. Chhajed, C. Gysin, E. Pflimlin, and M. Tamm
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bronchodilators for Bronchoscopy in Patients With COPD
Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 765 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. T. Cowl, U. B. S. Prakash, and B. R. Kruger
The Role of Anticholinergics in Bronchoscopy : A Randomized Clinical Trial
Chest, July 1, 2000; 118(1): 188 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Chest Physicians.