Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bierman, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bierman, C. W.

Chest, Vol 80, 671-675, Copyright © 1981 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Short-term double-blind evaluation of flunisolide aerosol for steroid- dependent asthmatic children and adolescents

GG Shapiro, AE Izu, CT Furukawa, WE Pierson and CW Bierman

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of flunisolide aerosol prescribed as .5 mg (two inhalations) twice daily and placebo in terms of oral steroid sparing ability in a population of 32 known steroid-dependent children and adolescents. Patients were stabilized on the lowest tolerated dose of daily AM or alternate AM oral corticosteroid for at least one month before entering the study. They were randomly assigned to either flunisolide or placebo treatment for the 12-week, double-blind trial. Patients were seen every two weeks for symptom assessment, physical examination, and pulmonary function testing. Tests of adrenal function were done initially and at the study's conclusion. The flunisolide group had improved asthma control compared with the placebo group. The daily oral steroid requirement decreased in 100 percent of the flunisolide group compared with 53 percent of the placebo group (P less than .01). Pulmonary function and endocrine function remained stable for both groups. There were no adverse effects. Flunisolide aerosol in doses of .5 mg twice daily appears to be topically active and to have oral steroid potential without apparent adverse effects.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Chest Physicians.