Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, H.

Chest, Vol 81, 51-54, Copyright © 1982 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Preservation of active atrial transport; an important clinical consideration in cardiac pacing

SI Cohen and HA Frank

Loss or reversal of the normal sequence of atrioventricular contraction, such as occurs during ventricular pacing, can significantly reduce cardiac output. Opinions vary regarding the size of the pacemaker population that might benefit from preservation of active atrial transport during cardiac pacing. An assessment of 260 consecutive patients who underwent implantation of a permanent transvenous pacemakers by the authors between 1970 and 1979 revealed 19 patients who had clinical symptoms or hypotension when active atrial transport was lost. Thirteen patients were symptomatic with syncope, dizziness, shock, heart failure or cough; six were asymptomatic but had systolic blood pressures lowered to the 80-100 mm Hg range. In all instances but one, attempts were made to restore atrial transport by one or more of the following methods: replacement of the pulse generator with a slower, single rate generator to minimize pacer competition with the normal sinus mechanism; slowing the rate of a programmable unit; implantation of an atrial pacing system; implantation of an atrioventricular sequential pacemaker system. Restoration of the normal sequence of chamber activation by any of these methods eliminated the symptoms and stabilized arterial blood pressure. We conclude that preservation of active atrial transport was clinically important in 7.3 percent of our heterogeneous permanent pacemaker population.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. J. Connolly, C. Kerr, M. Gent, and S. Yusuf
Dual-Chamber Versus Ventricular Pacing: Critical Appraisal of Current Data
Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 578 - 583.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American College of Chest Physicians.