Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cockcroft, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dolovich, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cockcroft, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dolovich, J.

Chest, Vol 82, 49-53, Copyright © 1982 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Occupational asthma caused by cedar urea formaldehyde particle board

DW Cockcroft, VH Hoeppner and J Dolovich

Two carpenters developed asthma and rhinitis related to occupational exposure to a cedar urea formaldehyde (CUF) particle board. One patient developed nasal and chest symptoms and an equivocal early asthmatic response after CUF sawdust exposure, but not after spruce or western red cedar sawdust exposure; possible late asthmatic response may have been inhibited by beclomethasone treatment. The other patient developed marked nasal and chest symptoms and a dual asthmatic response after CUF exposure, but not after spruce or cedar exposure. Both patients developed increased bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine, which persisted for at least six days in the first patient, and which was associated with increased asthmatic symptoms of days' to weeks' duration in both. A previously unexposed asthmatic patient, with more markedly hyperreactive bronchi, developed no symptoms, no change on spirometric testing, and no change in histamine response after CUF exposure. Specific IgE antibodies directed against formaldehyde-human serum albumin conjugate could not be demonstrated using the radioallergosorbent test. This investigation documents the occurrence of occupational asthma caused by urea formaldehyde used as a bonding agent in particle boards. Absence of a response in a previously unexposed, more severe asthmatic patient suggests specific sensitization to some component of the urea formaldehyde resin complex had developed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
A. Casset, C. Marchand, S. Le Calve, Ph. Mirabel, and F. de Blay
Human Exposure Chamber for Known Formaldehyde Levels: Generation and Validation
Indoor and Built Environment, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 173 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American College of Chest Physicians.