Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, G

Chest, Vol 82, 686-691, Copyright © 1982 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

The normal right ventricular response to supine exercise

D Morrison, S Sorensen, J Caldwell, AL Wright, J Ritchie, JW Kennedy and G Hamilton

Nine normal, healthy young males performed graded, maximal supine bicycle exercise with monitoring of hemodynamic and gated blood pool parameters. Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was greater than 0.45 in all acquisitions at rest (mean +/- SD = 0.53 +/- 0.05) and increased greater than 0.05 in all subjects with maximal exercise (mean +/- SD = 0.69 +/- 0.06 at stage 4). There was a very close correspondence between RV and LV stroke counts from the radionuclide angiograms at rest and all exercise levels in all patients. Cardiac output changes by radionuclide data from the RV correlated closely with those obtained by the Fick technique. Multivariate analysis of RVEF vs pulmonary artery pressure, total pulmonary resistance, and heart rate showed that RVEF was inversely related to total pulmonary resistance in these patients (n = 43 acquisitions, r = 0.61, RVEF = 0.75 -- 0.001 TPR in dynes-sec/cm5 Sy.x = 0.07) and positively related to heart rate (n = 43, 4 = 0.78, RVEF = 0.34 + 0.0025 x HR Sy.x = 0.05). RVEF was not significantly related to the other hemodynamic parameters. These results suggest that in normal subjects RV systolic function is afterload-dependent and that total pulmonary resistance may be a suitable afterload index. The results emphasize that heart rate must be considered when comparing RVEF changes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Henriksen, J. Landelius, T. Kangro, T. Jonason, P. Hedberg, L. Wesslen, C.N. Rosander, C. Rolf, I. Ringqvist, and G. Friman
An echocardiographic study of right and left ventricular adaptation to physical exercise in elite female orienteers
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 1999; 20(4): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American College of Chest Physicians.