Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberger, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberger, A.

Chest, Vol 83, 102-108, Copyright © 1983 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Mitral valve E point-septal separation as an index of left ventricular function with valvular heart disease

KG Lehmann, AD Johnson and AL Goldberger

Echocardiographic mitral valve E point-septal separation (EPSS) has been found to be a useful hemodynamic index. Prior studies have shown a high negative correlation between EPSS and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) in selected patients, but the utility of this index with valvular heart disease has not been examined in detail. Cardiac catheterization and M-mode echocardiographic data were retrospectively analyzed from 30 patients with aortic stenosis, 18 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation, and 25 patients with chronic mitral regurgitation. For aortic stenosis patients (including those with coronary artery disease), an excellent correlation (r = -0.89, p less than 0.001) was observed between EPSS and angiographic EF. More modest correlations were noted for patients with aortic regurgitation (r = - 0.58, p less than 0.01) and mitral regurgitation (r = -0.63, p less than 0.001). For patients with aortic regurgitation, correlation improved to r = -0.83 by excluding subjects with marked (greater than 4 mm) fluttering of the anterior mitral valve leaflet. For patients with mitral regurgitation, the EPSS-EF correlation improved to r = -0.72 after excluding patients with atrial fibrillation. Compared with other echocardiographic indices of left ventricular function (percent shortening of the minor diameter or echo-derived EF), the EPSS demonstrated an equivalent or superior correlation with angiographic EF for each valvular lesion studied. We conclude that EPSS is a highly reliable index of left ventricular function with aortic stenosis, but its utility in unselected patients with chronic mitral or aortic regurgitation is limited.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Chest Physicians.