Chest, Vol 83, 751-754, Copyright © 1983 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Unimodal distribution of bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine in a random human population

DW Cockcroft, BA Berscheid and KY Murdock

The population distribution of bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine was examined in 300 randomly selected caucasian college students (aged 20 to 29 years). Bronchial responsiveness was measured as the histamine threshold, defined as the concentration producing an FEV1 fall greater than 2 SD below the mean of five prehistamine FEV1 measurements. The cumulative prevalence of asthma was 9.3 percent, including 2.7 percent with current asthma, 3.3 percent with asthma following allergen exposure only, and 3.3 percent with remote asthma. Allergic rhinitis was present in 10.7 percent; nonallergic rhinitis in 16.3 percent; 63.7 percent had neither asthma nor rhinitis. Histamine threshold ranged from unmeasurable (greater than 8 mg/ml) in 36 percent to 0.125 mg/ml in 0.3 percent. The distribution of histamine threshold values in the responsive range was unimodal, the asthmatic subjects representing a subgroup within the hyperresponsive distribution tail rather than a separate distribution peak. Examination of the FEV1 response to 8 mg/ml showed a range between 2.8 SD increase and 100 SD reduction; the population distribution of this variable was unimodal and log normal. We concluded that there is a continuous unimodal log normal distribution of bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine in a random human population. Rather than representing a separate (bimodal) peak or a sharp cutoff (of a unimodal tail), the asthmatic subjects show substantial overlap with the remainder of the population.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W. Cockcroft and B. E. Davis Lack of Tachyphylaxis to Methacholine at 24 h Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1248 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Chinn and J P Schouten Reproducibility of non-specific bronchial challenge in adults: implications for design, analysis and interpretation of clinical and epidemiological studies Thorax, May 1, 2005; 60(5): 395 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Postma and H. M. Boezen Rationale for the Dutch Hypothesis: Allergy and Airway Hyperresponsiveness as Genetic Factors and Their Interaction With Environment in the Development of Asthma and COPD Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2_suppl_1): 96S - 104S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. C. Sciurba Physiologic Similarities and Differences Between COPD and Asthma Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2_suppl_1): 117S - 124S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. O'Byrne and M. D. Inman Airway Hyperresponsiveness Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(2007): 411S - 416S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.-P. Boulet Asymptomatic Airway Hyperresponsiveness: A Curiosity or an Opportunity to Prevent Asthma? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 371 - 378. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Chinn Comparing and combining studies of bronchial responsiveness Thorax, May 1, 2002; 57(5): 393 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. LITONJUA, D. SPARROW, and S. T. WEISS The FEF25-75/FVC Ratio Is Associated with Methacholine Airway Responsiveness . The Normative Aging Study Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 1999; 159(5): 1574 - 1579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Renwick and M. J. Connolly The Relationship Between Age and Bronchial Responsiveness: Evidence From a Population Survey Chest, March 1, 1999; 115(3): 660 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chinn Methodology of bronchial responsiveness Thorax, November 1, 1998; 53(11): 984 - 988. [Full Text]

				V. Brusasco, E. Crimi, and R. Pellegrino Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: not just a matter of airway inflammation Thorax, November 1, 1998; 53(11): 992 - 998. [Full Text]

				C. LAPRISE and L.-P. BOULET Asymptomatic Airway Hyperresponsiveness: A Three-year Follow-up Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(2): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text]