Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pardee, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pardee, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, J. D.

Chest, Vol 85, 203-206, Copyright © 1984 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Bedside evaluation of respiratory distress

NE Pardee, RH Winterbauer and JD Allen

Observations made at the time of the first trial of independent ventilation in 112 episodes of mechanical ventilatory support led to identification of a group of indicators, each of which, when present, was significantly associated (p less than 0.05) with a need for continued mechanical ventilation and/or with death. Six of these were potentially suitable for use in a format for clinical assessment of the risk of respiratory failure: pulse over 120 or under 70 beats per minute, respiratory rate of over 30, palpable scalene muscle recruitment in inspiration, palpable abdominal tensing in expiration, presence of irregular irregularity of respiratory rhythm with apneic pauses of varying duration, and coma or any condition preventing a patient from responding appropriately to commands aimed at producing ventilatory movements like those needed for vital capacity testing. When none of the six signs was present, there was a 90 percent chance of a favorable outcome. With one or two indicators positive, more than 50 percent of the subjects required further ventilatory support or died. There were no favorable outcomes when three or more of the signs were present together.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Chest Physicians.