Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanlon, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bean, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanlon, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bean, B.

Chest, Vol 85, 244-247, Copyright © 1984 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

The contribution of echocardiography to the community practice of cardiology. A prospective study

JT Hanlon, DT Combs, RI Lowe and B Bean

The utility of echocardiography in a clinical office practice was assessed by prospectively studying 93 patients. Each patient was examined by a cardiologist and a diagnosis and management plan was outlined. An M-mode and 2D echocardiogram was then obtained and interpreted by a second cardiologist without knowledge of the clinical findings. Patients were then categorized as follows: group 1, clinical and echo diagnosis agree, management unchanged (67 patients); group 2, clinical and echo diagnosis agree, management changed (two patients); group 3, clinical and echo diagnosis disagree, management unchanged (16 patients); and group 4, clinical and echo diagnosis disagree, management changed (eight patients). Echocardiography significantly altered management of 11 percent of patients, provided additional important information in 48 percent, and confirmed the clinical impression in 74 percent of patients. It was particularly helpful in determining left ventricular structure and function, valvular anatomy, and in the diagnosis of clinically unsuspected idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Chest Physicians.