Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clement, A
Right arrow Articles by Girard, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clement, A
Right arrow Articles by Girard, F

Chest, Vol 85, 485-488, Copyright © 1984 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Comparison of transcutaneous and alveolar partial pressure of carbon dioxide during carbon dioxide breathing in healthy children

A Clement, C Gaultier, M Boule, B Gaudin and F Girard

In 18 healthy children three to 13 years of age, the transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PtcCO2) (Radiometer electrode) and the alveolar partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PACO2) (Beckman analyzer) were measured simultaneously during the breathing of room air and 5 percent carbon dioxide. The PtcCO2 electrode was placed on the anterior thorax and heated to 42 degrees C. The PACO2 was calculated on the 4/5 part of the carbon dioxide expired trace. Minute ventilation (VE) was measured in 11 cases. There was a significant correlation between PtcCO2 (in millimeters of mercury) and PACO2 (in millimeters of mercury) while breathing room air (PtcCO2 = 0.82 PACO2 + 19.7; r = 0.55; p less than 0.02) and while breathing 5 percent carbon dioxide (PtcCO2 = 0.77 PACO2 + 22.5; r = 0.61; p less than 0.01); however, the ratio of PtcCO2 over PACO2 was significantly lower while breathing 5 percent carbon dioxide (p less than 0.01) than while breathing room air. When considering the relationship between the increase in VE (delta VE while breathing 5 percent carbon dioxide and the changes in PACO2 (delta PACO2) or in PtcCO2 (delta PtcCO2), a significant correlation was found only between delta VE and delta PACO2, ie, delta VE = 0.41 delta PACO2 + 0.44 (r = 0.63; p less than 0.01). These results suggest that breathing carbon dioxide modified the factors acting on PtcCO2, possibly by changes in the vasomotor tone of cutaneous blood vessels. These modifications appeared to be variable from subject to subject. Therefore, we conclude that PtcCO2 does not appear to be an accurate quantitative index to assess ventilatory response to carbon dioxide.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Chest Physicians.