Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fusciardi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Viars, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fusciardi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Viars, P.

Chest, Vol 86, 30-34, Copyright © 1984 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Hemodynamic consequences of increasing mean airway pressure during high- frequency jet ventilation

J Fusciardi, JJ Rouby, D Benhamou and P Viars

Six critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure were ventilated using high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV)-frequency 100.min-1, driving pressure 35 psi, 1.8 mm inside diameter injector cannula. Hemodynamic measurements using radial artery and Swan-Ganz catheters, esophageal pressure (EP), and mean airway pressure (Paw) were measured at four different I:E ratios: 0.25, 0.43, 0.67 and 1.0. Static respiratory compliance, using the super syringe method, was measured during intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and during HFJV. The results suggested that decreased venous return, increased right ventricular afterload, and decreased PaCO2 accounted for the decrease in cardiac index observed during HFJV using elevated I:E ratios. These variations, related to marked increases in intrathoracic pressures, are very similar to those observed during conventional ventilation with PEEP.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Chest Physicians.