Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoonover, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Spurrier, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoonover, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Spurrier, P.

Chest, Vol 86, 854-859, Copyright © 1984 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Lateral position test and quantitative lung scan in the preoperative evaluation for lung resection

GA Schoonover, GN Olsen, WC McLain 3d, MR Habibian, DG Edwards and P Spurrier

The postpneumonectomy FEV1 was predicted in 24 patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (FEV1 less than or equal to 2.0 L) and a lung mass using the quantitative lung scan (QLS) and lateral position test (LPT). Although a good correlation (r = .72, p = 0.0006) was found between the FEV1 predicted by QLS and LPT, there was more than 10 percent difference between the result in 59 percent of the subjects. A subgroup of these patients performed multiple (two to five) LPTs, and the results were calculated blindly to assess variability. The variation seen was 14 times greater than in previously reported normal subjects. Calculations suggest that as many as 37 tracings would be needed on each patient to obtain an acceptably low measurement error. Whereas there was a good overall correlation between the predicted postpneumonectomy FEV1 using both methods, the variability found with LPT would suggest extreme caution in its use.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Chest Physicians.