Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schachter, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schachter, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, D.

Chest, Vol 87, 51-55, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Airway reactivity and cotton bract-induced bronchial obstruction

EN Schachter, E Zuskin, MG Buck, TJ Witek, GJ Beck and D Tyler

Most seemingly healthy persons challenged with an aerosol of cotton bract extract develop some degree of bronchospasm. The role of nonspecific reactivity of the airways in this reaction to cotton bract extract is undefined. We examined the relationship between airway responses to cotton bract extract and to methacholine, as well as between airway responses to cotton bract extract and to a bronchodilator. Twenty-two healthy subjects were screened for sensitivity to inhaled cotton bract extract. Pulmonary function was measured using partial expiratory flow-volume curves on which flow at 60 percent of the control vital capacity below total lung capacity was measured (MEF40%[P]) following ten minutes of inhalation of cotton bract extract. In the group screened, 12 were found to be responders to the extract, with drops in MEF40%(P) of 20 percent or more, and ten were found to be nonresponders. On separate days, we measured the responses of our subjects' airways to inhaled metaproterenol and methacholine. The mean threshold dose for methacholine in the responding group was 26.8 mg/ml, as compared to 55.6 mg/ml for the nonresponders (t = 2.52; p less than 0.05). Furthermore, the mean percent increase in MEF40%(P) following inhalation of metaproterenol was 41 percent in responders and 24 percent in nonresponders (t = 2.19; p less than 0.05). We conclude that some responders to cotton bract extract exhibit greater reactivity of the airways than nonresponders.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
X-R Wang, L-D Pan, H-X Zhang, B-X Sun, H-L Dai, and D C Christiani
A longitudinal observation of early pulmonary responses to cotton dust
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2003; 60(2): 115 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.