Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chadha, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sackner, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chadha, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sackner, M. A.

Chest, Vol 87, 6-10, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Respiratory drive in nonsmokers and smokers assessed by passive tilt and mouth occlusion pressure. Response to rebreathing carbon dioxide

TS Chadha, E Lang, S Birch and MA Sackner

The purpose of the present investigation was to assess respiratory center function in smokers using (1) measurement of mouth occlusion pressure during carbon dioxide rebreathing and (2) noninvasive measurement of breathing pattern during passive upright tilt. The breathing patterns of 20 normal nonsmokers and 20 smokers without major obstruction of the airways were monitored noninvasively with respiratory inductive plethysmography for 15 minutes in the supine position and then after 90 degrees head-up passive tilt to the standing position. In nonsmokers, significant increases from supine to standing positions included the following: (1) minute ventilation from 6.22 +/- 1.47 to 7.32 +/- 1.16 L/min (p less than 0.05); (2) tidal volume from 368 +/- 93 to 462 +/- 108 ml (p less than 0.01); and (3) mean inspiratory flow from 263 +/- 61 to 320 +/- 43 ml/sec (p less than 0.01). Responses of smokers to tilt were variable; 14 showed changes similar to nonsmokers, but six showed no increase of ventilation and respiratory drive upon tilting. The latter also showed blunted response to rebreathing carbon dioxide in the supine position as estimated by plotting mouth occlusion pressures against end-tidal carbon dioxide tension. These data suggest that disturbances of respiratory center control are common in smokers without major obstruction of the airways.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.