|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
Chest, Vol 87, 151-157, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians
ARTICLES |
MC Stock, JB Downs, PK Gauer, JM Alster and PB Imrey
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) administered at intervals with a mask and incentive spirometry (IS) were compared with a regimen of coughing and deep breathing (CDB) to determine which promoted the most rapid recovery of pulmonary function after upper abdominal operations in 65 adults. Postoperatively, FRC of patients in all groups was similar relative to preoperative values. However, mean FRC of patients who received CPAP increased more rapidly than did mean FRC of those receiving CDB when compared to the values obtained following operation (p less than 0.05). Incentive spirometry did not increase FRC to a greater extent than did CDB. Roentgenographic evidence of atelectasis 72 hours postoperatively was observed in 23 percent of CPAP patients (five of 22) and 42 percent and 41 percent of patients who received CDB (eight of 19) and IS (nine of 22). Two patients (3 percent) developed pneumonia. The low incidence of pneumonia regardless of the type of therapy may be attributable to vigorous, vigilant respiratory care in a population at high risk for developing pneumonia. Frequency and supervision of respiratory therapy may be more important than the type of therapy delivered after upper abdominal operations. Mask CPAP offers advantages because it requires no effort from the patient, and therapy is not painful.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Jaber, J.-M. Delay, G. Chanques, M. Sebbane, E. Jacquet, B. Souche, P.-F. Perrigault, and J.-J. Eledjam Outcomes of Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure After Abdominal Surgery Treated With Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2688 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Squadrone, M. Coha, E. Cerutti, M. M. Schellino, P. Biolino, P. Occella, G. Belloni, G. Vilianis, G. Fiore, F. Cavallo, et al. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Postoperative Hypoxemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, February 2, 2005; 293(5): 589 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Overend, C. M. Anderson, S. D. Lucy, C. Bhatia, B. I. Jonsson, and C. Timmermans The Effect of Incentive Spirometry on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications : A Systematic Review Chest, September 1, 2001; 120(3): 971 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Denehy and S. Berney The use of positive pressure devices by physiotherapists Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 821 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
International Consensus Conferences in Intensive Care Medicine: Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure . Organized Jointly by the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and the Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise, and approved by the ATS Board of Directors, December 2000 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2001; 163(1): 283 - 291. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. Karzai, E. Huttemann, M. Antonelli, and G. Conti Treatment of Postoperative Respiratory Failure JAMA, May 3, 2000; 283(17): 2239 - 2240. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Smetana Preoperative Pulmonary Evaluation N. Engl. J. Med., March 25, 1999; 340(12): 937 - 944. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Weiner, A. Man, M. Weiner, M. Rabner, J. Waizman, R. Magadle, D. Zamir, and Y. Greiff THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVE SPIROMETRY AND INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING ON PULMONARY FUNCTION AFTER LUNG RESECTION J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1997; 113(3): 552 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Vichinsky, C. M. Haberkern, L. Neumayr, A. N. Earles, D. Black, M. Koshy, C. Pegelow, M. Abboud, K. Ohene-Frempong, R. V. Iyer, et al. A Comparison of Conservative and Aggressive Transfusion Regimens in the Perioperative Management of Sickle Cell Disease N. Engl. J. Med., July 27, 1995; 333(4): 206 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |