Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartmann, V.
Right arrow Articles by Magnussen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartmann, V.
Right arrow Articles by Magnussen, H.

Chest, Vol 87, 174-179, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Effect of diltiazem on histamine- and carbachol-induced bronchospasm in normal and asthmatic subjects

V Hartmann and H Magnussen

Recently, several transmembrane calcium-channel blockers have been used in experimental models to investigate the mechanisms through which Ca++ ions contribute to the regulation of the contractile response of airway smooth muscle and to determine the therapeutic use of these drugs in bronchial asthma. Since the data from these studies are inconsistent and inconclusive, we studied the effect of diltiazem, a calcium-channel blocker previously not examined to our knowledge, on histamine- and carbachol-induced bronchoconstriction in healthy and in asymptomatic allergic bronchial asthma. The study was performed in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled fashion, using a single oral dose of 60 mg of diltiazem. Airway reactivity to histamine and carbachol expressed by PD35SGaw was significantly but weakly attenuated by diltiazem in the asthmatic, but not in the normal subjects. Baseline lung function was not significantly influenced by diltiazem. We concluded that the effect of diltiazem on unspecific airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects is too weak to justify a recommendation as therapy.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.