Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zell, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zell, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, J. H.

Chest, Vol 87, 212-216, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Volume of distribution of theophylline in acute exacerbations of reversible airway disease. Effect of body weight

M Zell, RA Curtis, WG Troyer Jr and JH Fischer

The literature is unclear as to whether theophylline loading doses should be based on total body weight (TBW) or ideal body weight (IBW). The objective of this study was to determine the most appropriate body weight for estimation of volume of distribution (Vd) in calculating theophylline loading dose in patients with acute bronchospasm. Fifty- four adult patients with acute bronchospasm requiring intravenous (IV) theophylline therapy were entered into the study. Patients were randomized into three theophylline loading dose groups based on (1) TBW, (2) IBW, and (3) adjusted body weight (ABW). Initial serum theophylline concentrations were used to determine an IV loading dose to reach a plasma concentration of 12 to 15 micrograms/ml. Percent prediction error was used to determine the appropriateness of each dosing group. Volumes of distribution were also determined for each group. There was a statistically significant difference at p less than 0.01 in the percent prediction error when patients in the TBW group were compared to the IBW and ABW groups. A statistically significant difference in the Vd was observed between the TBW and IBW group (p less than 0.01). We conclude that IBW is more appropriate than TBW or ABW for determining theophylline loading dose in patients with acute bronchospasm.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.