Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catanzaro, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Catanzaro, A.

Chest, Vol 87, 346-350, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Multiple puncture skin test and mantoux test in Southeast Asian refugees

A Catanzaro

Skin test reactions to PPD applied by Mantoux techniques were compared with reactions to tuberculin tine test (PPD-tine); tuberculin, old tine test (OT tine); Aplitest; and Mono-Vacc, tuberculin, old (Mono-Vacc) in newly arrived refugees from Cambodia and Laos. The reaction to Mantoux test was accepted as the "true reading" and compared to the reaction size to one of the multiple puncture tests (MPT). A 2 X 2 table was constructed and sensitivity, specificity, false negative, and false positive rates computed over a broad range of cut-off points for MPT. The MPTs were very sensitive (100 percent to 78 percent) but lacked specificity (78 percent to 18 percent) when a cut-off of 1 mm was used. Predictably, as the cut-off is moved to larger reactions, sensitivity decreases and specificity increases. The relationship between the two is emphasized in a receiver-operator characteristics analysis. The MPTs are not intended for diagnostic use. Reaction to the MPT should be interpreted with the same careful consideration that clinicians use to interpret reactions to the Mantoux test.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.