Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiep, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Otsap, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiep, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Otsap, B.

Chest, Vol 87, 381-383, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

A new pendant storage oxygen-conserving nasal cannula

BL Tiep, MJ Belman, C Mittman, R Phillips and B Otsap

With increasing interest in reducing the cost of oxygen therapy, we recently designed an oxygen-conserving cannula. It reduces the oxygen supply flow necessary to achieve adequate oxygen saturation, but because it requires the use of a reservoir situated under the nose, some patients find it obtrusive. We therefore designed a similar system but displaced the reservoir away from the face and onto the anterior chest wall where it could be hidden from view by the patient's clothing. We evaluated this pendant conserving nasal cannula (PNC) in seven hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We compared oxygen saturations achieved using the PNC vs the standard steady flow nasal cannula (SNC) at 0.5 through 4 L/min. The mean improvement in oxygen saturation using the PNC vs the SNC was 3.3 percent at 0.5 L/min, 4.3 percent at 1 L/min and 3.1 percent at 2 L/min. These differences were statistically significant (p less than 0.001). The saturation achieved by the PNC at 0.5 L/min was equivalent to that achieved by the SNC at 1.8 L/min. We conclude that the PNC provides effective oxygen delivery to patients at supply flows substantially less than the SNC. The device is aesthetically acceptable to patients and its widespread use in patients requiring chronic oxygen therapy could bring about significant financial savings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
C. P. Dumont and B. L. Tiep
Using a Reservoir Nasal Cannula in Acute Care
Crit. Care Nurse, August 1, 2002; 22(4): 41 - 46.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.