Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, R. A.

Chest, Vol 87, 598-602, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Quantitative assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with low-contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography

GB Mancini, JM Hodgson, V Legrand, ER Bates, FM Aueron, MT LeFree, JS Smith, GJ Beauman and RA Vogel

Few studies have compared the use of low-contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography with conventional ventriculography for quantitative assessment of both global and regional left ventricular function. Accordingly, 34 patients underwent conventional ventriculography using 36 ml of ionic contrast material and digital ventriculography (mask-mode) using 10 ml of contrast diluted in 10 ml of saline and injected over two seconds. Data from two patients were excluded because of ectopy during cineventriculography and from one because of ectopy during both studies. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated from both studies by an area-length method and used to calculate ejection fractions. Regional wall motion was quantitated by the centerline method. Results of linear regression analysis demonstrated high correlations for all parameters (end- diastolic volume, r = 0.85; end-systolic volume, r = 0.93; ejection fraction, r = 0.92; quantitative regional wall motion, r = 0.90). Thus, low-contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography provides an accurate assessment of both global and regional ventricular function and minimizes the required dose and inherent risks of contrast media.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.