Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bellia, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bonsignore, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bellia, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bonsignore, G.

Chest, Vol 88, 89-93, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Characteristics and prognostic value of morning dipping of peak expiratory flow rate in stable asthmatic subjects

V Bellia, F Cibella, G Migliara, G Peralta and G Bonsignore

Characteristics and prognostic relevance of morning dip of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were evaluated in stable asthmatic subjects. Among 246 outpatients monitored four times daily for two weeks, 38 (group A) showed a significant difference between morning reading of PEFR and each of the others; they were compared to 38 randomly selected patients (group B) not showing morning dip in PEFR. Less frequent seasonal course, extrinsic pathogenesis, and sensitization to mites characterized group A; starting airflow limitation was more severe in those with morning dip, but no significant difference between mean PEFR measured throughout two weeks was found. At 6 to 12 weeks, morning dip was not found in 19 of 38 subjects in group A and appeared in seven of 38 subjects in group B, with no clearcut relationship to treatment being evident. At 25 to 104 weeks, no significant difference between therapeutic requirements and the forced expiratory volume in one second was detected; therefore, unlike the short-term, morning dip is not a risk factor for worse long- term prognosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page

North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management of asthma in adults
BMJ, March 23, 1996; 312(7033): 762 - 766.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.