Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baughman, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Loudon, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baughman, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Loudon, R. G.

Chest, Vol 88, 364-368, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Lung sound analysis for continuous evaluation of airflow obstruction in asthma

RP Baughman and RG Loudon

We developed a system for monitoring airflow obstruction noninvasively, based on the principle that the proportion of the breath cycle occupied by wheezing (Tw/Ttot) in any one subject corresponds to the severity of airways obstruction. Lung sounds were recorded continuously from the chest wall. Fifty 250 ms sound segments were randomly chosen from five- minute periods and analyzed for the presence or absence of wheezes. The proportion with wheezes was used as an estimate of Tw/Ttot (Est Tw/Ttot). For 12 wheezy patients, there was a good correlation between the Est Tw/Ttot and the forced expiratory volume in one second (r = 0.893, p less than 0.001). The system was used to evaluate nocturnal asthma. Five subjects were studied over eight nights. It was found that there was more wheezing from 4:00 to 4:30 AM than from midnight to 12:30 AM (p less than 0.05). This technique may prove useful in continuous, noninvasive monitoring of wheezy patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
L. Bentur, R. Beck, D. Berkowitz, J. Hasanin, I. Berger, N. Elias, and N. Gavriely
Adenosine Bronchial Provocation With Computerized Wheeze Detection in Young Infants With Prolonged Cough: Correlation With Long-term Follow-up
Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1060 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
L. Bentur, R. Beck, M. Shinawi, T. Naveh, and N. Gavriely
Wheeze monitoring in children for assessment of nocturnal asthma and response to therapy
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2003; 21(4): 621 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. PASTERKAMP, S. S. KRAMAN, and G. R. WODICKA
Respiratory Sounds . Advances Beyond the Stethoscope
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1997; 156(3): 974 - 987.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.