Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisenstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Selvester, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisenstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Selvester, R. H.

Chest, Vol 88, 409-416, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis of posterior wall myocardial infarction. Significance of the T wave

I Eisenstein, ME Sanmarco, WL Madrid and RH Selvester

The electrocardiographic diagnosis of posterior wall myocardial infarction remains elusive. To determine discriminating criteria a group of 27 patients with posterior infarction proven by biplane angiocardiography were compared to 97 controls. All patients had single- vessel obstruction of the circumflex artery or one of its major branches (greater than or equal to 75 percent area stenosis) without occlusive disease in the other coronary arteries. High-frequency, high- gain electrocardiograms and Cube and McFee vectorcardiograms were analyzed. Pathologic Q waves in the inferior leads were present in only 22 percent (six) of the patients; increased R-wave amplitude or duration in the right precordial leads was found in 17 to 26 percent, and an R/S ratio greater than or equal to I in lead V1 or greater than or equal to 1.5 in lead V2 was present in 22 percent (six) of patients. Vectorcardiographic criteria which improved the diagnostic yield were: (1) the presence of a QRS loop mostly anterior to the E point, and (2) the presence of an abnormally anterior T wave. This abnormal T-wave shift was present in over 70 percent of the patients with posterior infarctions and was clearly discernible from the 12-lead ECG, as manifested by tall T waves in lead V2 and flat T waves in lead V6. To approximate the T-wave angle in the 12-lead scalar ECG, an index was calculated by subtracting the amplitude of the T wave in lead V6 from its amplitude in lead V2 (T2-T6 index). An index of 0.38 mV or more yielded a sensitivity of 81 percent and a specificity of 75 percent; however, this was not as discriminating as the vectorcardiogram where a T angle of 60 degrees or more in the horizontal plane yielded a sensitivity of 70 percent and a specificity of 97 percent.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
T Pollehn, W J Brady, A D Perron, and F Morris
The electrocardiographic differential diagnosis of ST segment depression
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2002; 19(2): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Matetzky, D. Freimark, M. S. Feinberg, I. Novikov, S. Rath, B. Rabinowitz, E. Kaplinsky, and H. Hod
Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST-segment elevation in posterior chest leads V7-9: "hidden" ST-segment elevations revealing acute posterior infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 748 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.