Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chin, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sibbald, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chin, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sibbald, W. J.

Chest, Vol 88, 503-511, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Assisted ventilation in patients with preexisting cardiopulmonary disease. The effect on systemic oxygen consumption, oxygen transport, and tissue perfusion variables

WD Chin, HW Cheung, AA Driedger, DG Cunningham and WJ Sibbald

We have evaluated systemic oxygen consumption (VO2), systemic oxygen transport, and tissue perfusion variables in 30 patients with preexisting cardiac and underlying pulmonary disease during continuous positive-pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], during intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV and PEEP), and during spontaneous ventilation (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP]), with end-expiratory pressure held constant during all ventilatory modes. Using radionuclide angiography together with invasive determinations of pressure and flow, we also measured left and right ventricular ejection fractions and calculated the end-systolic (ESVI) and end-diastolic (EDVI) volume indices of both ventricles. We found that oxygen transport was significantly greater during CPAP (583 +/- 172 ml/min/M2)(mean +/- SD) than during either IMV and PEEP (543 +/- 151 ml/min/sq; p less than 0.01) or CPPV and PEEP (526 +/- 159 ml/min/M2; p less than 0.01); however, we found no significant change in systemic VO2 with conversion from CPPV and PEEP to CPAP. The increase in oxygen transport was related to a greater cardiac index and, more specifically, to a higher heart rate during CPAP (CPAP, 106 +/- 16 beats per minute; CPPV and PEEP, 97 +/- 14 beats per minute) (p less than 0.01). Enhanced oxygen transport during CPAP was also associated with an increase in mixed venous oxygenation and a decrease in arterial lactate. Although neither the mean left ventricular EDVI nor ESVI changed from CPPV and PEEP to CPAP, the mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased (CPPV and PEEP, 12 +/- 5 mm Hg; CPAP, 14 +/- 7 mm Hg) (p less than 0.01), suggesting the possibility of a decrease in left ventricular compliance with the spontaneous ventilatory mode. This study suggests that in the absence of ventilatory failure, spontaneous ventilation provides for better systemic oxygen transport and overall tissue perfusion than either controlled ventilation or IMV; however, this benefit of enhanced oxygen delivery with spontaneous ventilation may potentially be offset by a decrease in left ventricular compliance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.