Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conradson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Persson, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Conradson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Persson, G

Chest, Vol 88, 537-542, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with mild-to-moderate obstructive lung disease. Comparison of beta-agonist therapy alone and in combination with a xanthine derivative, enprofylline or theophylline

TB Conradson, G Eklundh, B Olofsson, O Pahlm and G Persson

Long-term ambulatory Holter-monitoring was used to evaluate the arrhythmogenic effects of beta 2-agonist therapy, alone and in combination with a xanthine derivative, theophylline or enprofylline. Twenty patients (mean age 51 years) with mild-to-moderate obstructive lung disease (bronchial asthma or chronic bronchitis), but without concomitant ischemic heart disease were studied. Compared with beta 2- agonist therapy alone, both combined regimens were associated with a small but significant increase in the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias. Few serious arrhythmias were observed, however, and the clinical significance of these findings is thought to be minor. Although adenosine has been suggested to have an antiarrhythmic effect, a difference between theophylline and enprofylline in the effect on adenosine (theophylline but not enprofylline being an adenosine antagonist) would appear to be of less cardiac relevance in patients without ischemic heart disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
G. T. Ferguson, C. Funck-Brentano, T. Fischer, P. Darken, and C. Reisner
Cardiovascular Safety of Salmeterol in COPD
Chest, June 1, 2003; 123(6): 1817 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
H. Satoh and K. Sekizawa
Elderly Asthmatic Patients
Arch Intern Med, January 13, 2003; 163(1): 122 - 122.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M. Cazzola, C. F. Donner, and M. G. Matera
Long acting beta 2 agonists and theophylline in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Thorax, August 1, 1999; 54(8): 730 - 736.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.