Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soffer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Farr, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soffer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Farr, S.

Chest, Vol 88, 663-668, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Conservation of oxygen supply using a reservoir nasal cannula in hypoxemic patients at rest and during exercise

M Soffer, DP Tashkin, BJ Shapiro, M Littner, E Harvey and S Farr

A reservoir nasal cannula which stores oxygen during exhalation and delivers it as a bolus during inhalation has been reported to conserve oxygen delivery in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at rest. We compared the effects upon arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) of the reservoir cannula and a standard nasal cannula in hypoxemic obstructed and restricted patients at rest and during exercise. The SaO2 was monitored by ear oximeter. While at rest, 13 obstructed and four restricted patients breathed oxygen from the reservoir cannula at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 L/min and from a standard cannula at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 L/min. Mean SaO2 was significantly higher with the reservoir cannula compared to the standard cannula at 1.0 and 2.0 L/min (p less than 0.0006) and tended to be higher at 0.5 L/min (p less than 0.1). Seven obstructed patients walked on a level treadmill at 0.75 mph while breathing oxygen at 0.5 and 1.5 L/min from the reservoir cannula and at 1.0 and 3.0 L/min from the standard cannula. The SaO2 during exercise with the reservoir cannula was comparable to that with the standard cannula at approximately half of the oxygen flow rate. The ratio of the oxygen flow rate of the standard to the reservoir cannula to produce 90 percent saturation was estimated and found to be 2.5 +/- 0.8 (mean +/- SD) for patients at rest and 2.9 +/- 1.8 during exercise. We conclude that in hypoxemic patients at rest and during exercise, the reservoir cannula uses less than half the oxygen of a standard cannula to produce similar improvement in SaO2 and thus has advantages of a reduced cost of ambulatory therapy with low-flow oxygen and a longer time permitted away from a stationary source of oxygen.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crit Care NurseHome page
C. P. Dumont and B. L. Tiep
Using a Reservoir Nasal Cannula in Acute Care
Crit. Care Nurse, August 1, 2002; 22(4): 41 - 46.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.