Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McPherson, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Montague, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McPherson, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Montague, T. J.

Chest, Vol 88, 841-848, Copyright © 1985 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Indirect measurement of infarct size. Correlative variability of enzyme, radionuclear angiographic, and body-surface-map variables in 34 patients during the acute phase of first myocardial infarction

DD McPherson, BM Horacek, CA Spencer, DE Johnstone, LD Lalonde, CL Cousins and TJ Montague

To gain a correlative perspective of indirect indications of the size of a myocardial infarct, we measured several body-surface electrocardiographic variables and several enzyme and radionuclear angiographic indicators of an infarct's size in 34 patients during the acute phase of first infarction. We found that bivariate correlations ranged widely, from an r value of 0.05 to an r value of 0.92, but were significantly (p less than 0.001) higher when variables from the same technique were correlated (mean r, 0.60 +/- 0.27), as opposed to correlations of variables from different techniques (mean r, 0.27 +/- 0.18). Trivariate comparisons among techniques produced significantly (p less than 0.001) higher r values, but the highest, an r value of 0.76 (total wall motion abnormality score; peak lactic dehydrogenase level; ST-segment integral maximum), indicated that even in this best case, only about 60 percent of the variation of one variable was dependent on or due to the two other variables. These data demonstrate that multiple indirect quantitative indicators of myocardial injury can vary widely in their correlations within the same population of infarcts, and much remains unknown in their relationships during the acute phase. Caution should be exercised, therefore, in their clinical application to predict an infarct's size in individual patients with acute myocardial infarction.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Chest Physicians.