Chest, Vol 89, 27-29, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Observer agreement, chest auscultation, and crackles in asbestos- exposed workers

P Workum, EA DelBono, SK Holford and RL Murphy Jr

Investigators cite observer variability as a problem in using crackles to diagnose asbestosis. We measured agreement on the presence or absence of crackles noted during auscultation of 64 asbestos-exposed workers in order to clarify this question. There was 89 percent agreement between two observers who simultaneously examined subjects breathing from functional residual capacity (FRC). Kappa (kappa), a statistic accounting for chance agreement, was 0.73. Unanimous agreement between four observers who listened to tape recordings of the breath sounds was 81 percent (kappa = 0.69). When the subjects breathed from residual volume (RV) there was 78 percent (kappa = 0.53) and 67 percent (kappa = 0.60) agreement, respectively. Comparing direct to tape-playback auscultation, there was 90 percent (kappa = 0.77) and 84 percent (kappa = 0.58) intraobserver agreement when the subjects breathed from FRC and 90 percent (kappa = 0.79) and 75 percent (kappa = 0.39) when they breathed from RV. We conclude that observer variability is sufficiently low to allow trained observers to monitor asbestos- exposed workers for crackles directly and during tape-playback auscultation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Ross The Clinical Diagnosis of Asbestosis in This Century Requires More Than a Chest Radiograph Chest, September 1, 2003; 124(3): 1120 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kiyokawa, M. Greenberg, K. Shirota, and H. Pasterkamp Auditory Detection of Simulated Crackles in Breath Sounds Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1886 - 1892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. PASTERKAMP, S. S. KRAMAN, and G. R. WODICKA Respiratory Sounds . Advances Beyond the Stethoscope Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1997; 156(3): 974 - 987. [Full Text] [PDF]