Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R.
Right arrow Articles by Iskandrian, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fox, R.
Right arrow Articles by Iskandrian, A.

Chest, Vol 89, 352-356, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Coronary artery cardiomyopathy. Hemodynamic and prognostic implications

RM Fox, PF Nestico, BJ Munley, AH Hakki, D Neumann and AS Iskandrian

To assess the prevalence and significance of left ventricular dilatation in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction secondary to coronary artery disease (or coronary artery cardiomyopathy), we studied 70 patients with an ejection fraction of 35 percent or less and one-vessel coronary artery disease (n = 14) or with multivessel coronary artery disease (n = 56). None had had a recent myocardial infarction or valvular heart disease. Patients who underwent myocardial revascularization during follow-up were excluded. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (measured by contrast ventriculography) was less than 110 ml/sq m in 14 patients (20 percent) (group 1), and was 110 ml/sq m or more in 56 patients (80 percent) (group 2). There were no differences between the two groups in age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, extent of coronary artery disease, or left ventricular asynergy. Patients in group 1 had lower pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (13 +/- 6 vs 22 +/- 10 mm Hg; p = 0.0008), lower left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (21 +/- 6 vs 27 +/- 9 mm Hg; p = 0.007), and higher left ventricular ejection fraction (31 +/- 2 vs 25 +/- 7 percent; p = 0.001) than patients in group 2. At a mean follow-up of 27 months, 24 patients had died of cardiac causes, all of whom were in group 2. Survival was significantly better in group 1 than in group 2 (Mantel-Cox, p = 0.009). Survival analysis (Cox models) of 20 clinical, hemodynamic, and angiographic variables showed that ejection fraction (chi2 = 13.6; p less than 0.001) and end- diastolic volume chi2 = 4.7; p = 0.03) were the most significant predictors of death. Thus, minimally dilated coronary artery cardiomyopathy is a distinct entity with favorable hemodynamics. Prognostically, the end-diastolic volume adds significant predictive information to the ejection fraction among conservatively treated patients.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Chest Physicians.