Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molloy, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Prewitt, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molloy, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Prewitt, R. M.

Chest, Vol 89, 636-640, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Hemodynamic management in clinical acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Dopamine vs dobutamine

DW Molloy, J Ducas, K Dobson, L Girling and RM Prewitt

We investigated short-term hemodynamic effects of dopamine and dobutamine in eight patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We tested the hypothesis that for a similar increase in cardiac output, left ventricular filling pressure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP]) would increase with dopamine and decrease with dobutamine. Dopamine increased cardiac output (p less than 0.05), stroke volume (p less than 0.05), and PCWP (p less than 0.01). Cardiac output increased almost 20 percent when PCWP increased 50 percent with dopamine. In contrast, despite a mean 30 percent increase in cardiac output with dobutamine (p less than 0.01), PCWP decreased. In six of these patients, left ventricular end-diastolic volumes and end-systolic volumes were measured using scintigraphic techniques. In all patients, end-diastolic volume increased with dopamine (p less than 0.05); and in four of six, end-systolic volume increased. In contrast, with dobutamine, in five of six patients, end-diastolic volume decreased; and in all six patients, end-systolic volume decreased. There was a small increase in intrapulmonary shunt with both drugs. We conclude that if an inotropic agent is required to increase cardiac output in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, dobutamine is probably preferred over dopamine.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
M. M. Levy
Pathophysiology of Oxygen Delivery in Respiratory Failure
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5_suppl_2): 547S - 553S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Chest Physicians.