Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwieger, I.
Right arrow Articles by Suter, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwieger, I.
Right arrow Articles by Suter, P. M.

Chest, Vol 89, 652-656, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Absence of benefit of incentive spirometry in low-risk patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. A controlled randomized study

I Schwieger, Z Gamulin, A Forster, P Meyer, M Gemperle and PM Suter

To determine the potential benefit of incentive spirometry, which has been advocated to prevent pulmonary complications after upper-abdominal surgery, we compared a group of patients receiving incentive spirometry to another group receiving no specialized postoperative respiratory care. Forty patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists' class 1 and 2 who were undergoing cholecystectomy (through right subcostal incision) were included in the study and were randomly allocated to one of the two groups. Patients receiving incentive spirometry were encouraged by a specialized respiratory physiotherapist to breathe deeply for five minutes hourly, 12 times daily, for three postoperative days. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in the radiologic evidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, arterial oxygen pressure, spirometric measurement, and clinical evaluation at the second or fourth postoperative day (or both). In particular, deterioration on the chest x-ray film at the fourth postoperative day was observed in eight of 20 patients in the group receiving incentive spirometry and in six of 20 in the control group. Our study confirms the postoperative deterioration of respiratory function after upper-abdominal surgery and demonstrates the lack of therapeutic values of incentive spirometry in these patients at low risk for pulmonary complications.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
T. J. Overend, C. M. Anderson, S. D. Lucy, C. Bhatia, B. I. Jonsson, and C. Timmermans
The Effect of Incentive Spirometry on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications : A Systematic Review
Chest, September 1, 2001; 120(3): 971 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
J. Weindler and R.-T. Kiefer
The Efficacy of Postoperative Incentive Spirometry Is Influenced by the Device-Specific Imposed Work of Breathing
Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1858 - 1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
J. C Hall, R. A Tarala, J. Tapper, and J. L Hall
Prevention of respiratory complications after abdominal surgery: a randomised clinical trial
BMJ, January 20, 1996; 312(7024): 148 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Chest Physicians.