Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by French, W.
Right arrow Articles by Laks, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by French, W.
Right arrow Articles by Laks, M.

Chest, Vol 90, 181-184, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Yield of endomyocardial biopsy in patients with biventricular failure. Comparison of patients with normal vs reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

WJ French, RJ Siegel, AH Cohen and MM Laks

Twenty five patients with biventricular failure underwent endomyocardial biopsy procedures. Twelve of these 25 patients had normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Endomyocardial biopsy sampling was useful in eight of 12 patients (67 percent) with biventricular failure and normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Biopsy specimens in five of these 12 patients demonstrated endocardial or infiltrative heart disease and excluded these diseases in three other patients with constrictive pericarditis. This study suggests that the clinical presentation of biventricular failure, combined with the noninvasive determination of a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, is helpful in selecting patients for endomyocardial biopsy study. Patients with biventricular failure and normal left ventricular ejection fractions have a high probability of having pericardial or infiltrative heart disease, conditions that often can be differentiated only by analysis of myocardial tissue. Hemodynamic assessment of patients without infiltrative processes further allows one to eliminate those patients with a high likelihood of having constrictive pericardial disease.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Chest Physicians.