Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rinow, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saltzman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rinow, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saltzman, A.

Chest, Vol 90, 204-207, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Effectiveness of a new oxygen demand valve in chronic hypoxemia

ME Rinow and AR Saltzman

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of nasal oxygen delivery by an inspiratory demand valve, which delivers oxygen only during the inspiratory phase, to standard continuous flow oxygen. The inspiratory demand valve attaches to an oxygen source and delivers oxygen after the sensor detects negative pressure through a standard nasal cannula. Seventeen male patients with chronic hypoxemia secondary to COPD were studied under resting conditions. Nine patients with hypoxemia at rest or with exercise were studied using an exercise protocol. Oxygen was delivered at a flow rate which improved the oxygen saturation by 4 percent. Oxygen saturation was measured continuously by an ear oximeter. The results indicate that oxygen saturation was not significantly different for either method of oxygen delivery at rest or during exercise. The time oxygen was delivered was significantly reduced during demand valve use, being 55 percent less at rest and 52 percent less during exercise when compared to continuous oxygen. Further study would be helpful to determine whether the device would reliably deliver oxygen during continuous use and whether it could be adapted to portable systems.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Langenhof and J. Fichter
Comparison of Two Demand Oxygen Delivery Devices for Administration of Oxygen in COPD
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2082 - 2087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Chest Physicians.