Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olive, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Olive, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, K

Chest, Vol 90, 208-211, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Comparison of PY 108-068, a new calcium antagonist, with nifedipine in exercise-induced asthma

SR Olive, JE Hansen, DY Sue, I Ben-Dov and K Wasserman

Several calcium antagonists, each with significantly different chemical structures, have demonstrated variable attenuation of exercise-induced asthma. Quantitative comparisons have been hampered by differences in the intensity of challenge and the severity of the underlying disease between groups of patients. In 12 asthmatic adults with relatively severe exercise-induced asthma, we compared the effect of a new calcium antagonist, PY 108-068, in doses of 75 mg and 150 mg with nifedipine (30 mg) and placebo on resting flow rates and flow rates after exercise. Over a three-week period, each patient completed a four-day, randomized, double-blind Latin-square study. After receiving one of four oral drugs, spirometry was repeated every 30 minutes for two hours, followed by a six-minute treadmill exercise test breathing dry air. The exercise tests were well matched for work rate, ventilation, heart rate, and oxygen uptake. Spirometry was then repeated seven times over the next 30 minutes after exercise. Though both 150 mg of PY 108- 068 and nifedipine were associated with mild bronchodilation before exercise, only the latter was significant (p less than 0.05). Exercise- induced asthma (expressed as maximal percent fall in the forced expiratory volume in one second from before baseline) was significantly attenuated only by 150 mg of PY 108-068 compared to placebo (24 +/- 13 vs 40 +/- 16; p less than 0.05). Headache, which occurred in six subjects after nifedipine, five after 150 mg of PY 108-068, one after 75 mg of PY 108-068, and none after placebo, was subjectively more severe after nifedipine. We conclude that in these patients, there was a tendency for mild bronchodilation before exercise with both 150 mg of PY 108-068 and nifedipine, but only the 150-mg dose provided significant protection against exercise-induced asthma two hours after the drug.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Chest Physicians.