|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
Chest, Vol 90, 338-345, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians
ARTICLES |
WD Johnson, KL Kayser, PM Pedraza and JB Brenowitz
The results of 127 operations with both valve replacement and coronary bypass were compared with all 5,053 operations involving coronary bypass performed from August 1972 through June 1985. Both groups were stratified by the number of risk factors (age over 70 years, bad ventricle, extensive endarterectomy, and reoperation). Compared with all bypass operations, valve replacement had no effect on surgical mortality except in the group at highest risk. Conversely, valve replacement was associated with reduced late survival in all but those at highest risk. Results with tissue valves were better than with mechanical, but statistical significance was lacking. Relief of angina was equal. Ischemic mitral insufficiency continues to be the greatest challenge, with 46 percent five-year survival. We conclude that combined valve replacement and bypass surgery can be performed successfully, even in the patients at higher risk; however, this operation should be performed only by teams with demonstrated success in surgically treating advanced coronary artery disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. LeBoutillier III and V. J. DiSesa Valvular and Ischemic Heart Disease Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1057 - 1074. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |