Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferro, G
Right arrow Articles by Condorelli, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ferro, G
Right arrow Articles by Condorelli, M

Chest, Vol 90, 558-561, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Relation between QT and QS2 intervals during exercise and recovery. Response in patient with coronary artery disease and age-matched control subjects

G Ferro, M Romano, G Carella, MR Cotecchia, T Di Maro, M Chiariello and M Condorelli

We investigated the relationship between QT interval and QS2 (electromechanical systole) during exercise and recovery in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia (n = 12), and in age-matched controls (n = 20). Upright bicycle exercise was performed (50 watts/min + 20 watts/min every 2 min), recording electrocardiographic lead 2 (100 mm/sec) for QT and QS2 measurement at rest, at each step of uninterrupted exercise and every 60 sec during a 3-min recovery period. Resting data showed a QT less than QS2 finding in both groups; during exercise, QT and QS2 decreased. The values of QT and QS2, collected at each step of exercise and plotted against heart rate (HR) separately for both groups, showed a significant correlation coefficient. Comparing the regression lines of HR-QT and HR-QS2 separately for both groups, we found that both intervals decreased in parallel and the mean QT remained shorter than QS2 in both groups during exercise. The QT/QS2 ratio remained unchanged significantly during exercise and recovery in CAD. In control subjects, the ratio remained unchanged during exercise and the first min of recovery, while a significant change was detected in late (2,3 min) recovery from an adrenergic-induced effect. The mean exercise-induced response of QT-QS2 relationship includes a QT less than QS2 pattern in both groups. In CAD patients, an abnormal pattern was found in two patients during recovery by a relative prolongation of QT, suggesting the possibility of a risk factor for dangerous arrhythmias or sudden death.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Chest Physicians.