Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Belman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M.

Chest, Vol 90, 662-669, Copyright © 1986 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Resistive breathing training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

MJ Belman, SG Thomas and MI Lewis

In order to investigate the effect of resistive breathing training on ventilatory muscular endurance, we examined the maximal sustained ventilatory capacity in ten patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) before and after a six-week program of resistive breathing training. In addition, we investigated the effect of altered breathing strategy on resistive breathing performance. The patients performed two 15-minute sessions of resistive breathing daily for six weeks using an inspiratory resistive device (Pflex). Before and after the training, we found no significant change in spirometric data, pulmonary volumes, maximal inspiratory pressure, and maximal expiratory pressure. Of the ten patients, seven failed to show an improvement in their performance of resistive breathing. Furthermore, the maximal sustained ventilatory capacity was unchanged after the resistive breathing training. After the completion of the training program, seven of the patients participated in an additional experiment in which they were instructed to take long slow inspirations while breathing through the resistive device. With this change in breathing pattern, five of the seven were able to improve their performance of resistive breathing. Analysis of the breathing strategy showed that a reduction in the peak mouth pressure, breathing frequency, and external resistive work with a longer inspiratory time was beneficial. We conclude that neither resistive breathing performance nor ventilatory muscular endurance, as measured by sustained hyperpnea, is improved by resistive breathing training performed according to the current instructions with the resistive device, and alterations in breathing strategy have a profound effect on the performance of resistive breathing. The lack of details of breathing strategy in previous studies of resistive breathing makes it difficult to determine if previously demonstrated improvements were due to a real enhancement of ventilatory muscular performance or merely secondary to a different strategy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
ATS/ERS Statement on Respiratory Muscle Testing
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2002; 166(4): 518 - 624.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Chest Physicians.