Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schoene, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schoene, R.

Chest, Vol 91, 496-499, Copyright © 1987 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Prediction of successful ventilator weaning using airway occlusion pressure and hypercapnic challenge

AB Montgomery, RH Holle, SR Neagley, DJ Pierson and RB Schoene

We studied eleven patients during 14 attempts at weaning from mechanical ventilation to determine whether central ventilatory drive, measured as airway occlusion pressure 0.1 s after onset of inspiration (P 0.1), during spontaneous breathing before and during a brief hypercapnic challenge, could accurately predict the success or failure of the attempt. All patients were recovering from acute respiratory failure and could breathe spontaneously for 20 minutes on a T-piece but were judged clinically to be marginal weaning candidates. Minute ventilation (VI) and P 0.1 were measured while breathing spontaneously and were repeated during a hypercapnic challenge that raised end-tidal PCO2 approximately 10 mm Hg. Seven of the 14 weaning attempts were unsuccessful, requiring reinstitution of mechanical ventilation. Although the failure group had lower mean maximum inspiratory force and higher spontaneous respiratory rate, no threshold value separated the failure from the success group. Ventilation increased more during hypercapnic challenge in those patients whose weaning attempt was successful, but overlap of results between the two groups rendered this test inaccurate for predicting weaning success. In contrast, successfully weaned patients had greater augmentation of P 0.1 during hypercapnia, expressed as the ratio of P 0.1 during CO2-stimulated to P 0.1 during baseline values, than did those who failed weaning (p less than 0.005). This ratio succeeded, and was thus both specific and sensitive as a predictor of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in these patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. E. Holliday and M. Lippmann
Reduction in Ventilatory Response to CO2 With Relaxation Feedback During CO2 Rebreathing for Ventilator Patients
Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1500 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J Goldstone
The pulmonary physician in critical care * 10: Difficult weaning
Thorax, November 1, 2002; 57(11): 986 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. Topeli, F. Laghi, and M.J. Tobin
The voluntary drive to breathe is not decreased in hypercapnic patients with severe COPD
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2001; 18(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. C. Kocis, P. J. Radell, W. I. Sternberger, J. E. Benson, R. J. Traystman, and D. G. Nichols
Ultrasound evaluation of piglet diaphragm function before and after fatigue
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1997; 83(5): 1654 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Chest Physicians.