Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, S.
Right arrow Articles by Koerner, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, S.
Right arrow Articles by Koerner, S.

Chest, Vol 92, 686-691, Copyright © 1987 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Prostaglandin E1 as a screening vasodilator in primary pulmonary hypertension

SM Halpern, PK Shah, S Lehrman, HS Goldberg, AC Jasper and SK Koerner
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles 90048.

Pulmonary vasodilators are variably efficacious in primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). None has consistently improved hemodynamics enough to obviate the need for complex and potentially hazardous testing of several vasodilators. Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), a potent, short-acting pulmonary vasodilator, was administered to seven patients with PPH in order to determine whether PGE1 could accurately predict the hemodynamic and gas exchange effects of other commonly used vasodilators. Prostaglandin E1, nifedipine and hydralazine were administered to the patients while measuring pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics and arterial blood gases. Prostaglandin E1 was easily titrated but was inconsistent as a predictor of the effects of the other vasodilators with respect to pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output and adverse effects on arterial oxygenation. This study suggests that patients with PPH must still receive carefully monitored trials of several vasodilators to determine whether there is a beneficial response and to select the appropriate treatment.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Chest Physicians.