Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, M
Right arrow Articles by Kinney, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, M
Right arrow Articles by Kinney, J.

Chest, Vol 92, 979-983, Copyright © 1987 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Metabolic and respiratory changes during weaning from mechanical ventilation

M Kemper, C Weissman, J Askanazi, AI Hyman and JM Kinney
Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York.

Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a procedure performed daily in intensive care units. This study sought to determine whether among postoperative patients there were any differences in the changes in oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) between those patients in whom mechanical ventilation was successfully discontinued and those in whom it was continued or reinstituted. A stepwise reduction in mandatory breaths (from 10 to 12 to 4 to 6), followed by a period of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), was the weaning method. In the group of patients (N = 18) who were successfully weaned, VO2 and VCO2 increased 10 +/- 8 (SD) percent and 10 +/- 9 percent, respectively, while VE decreased 9 +/- 8 percent and PaCO2 was unchanged when values at an IMV of 10 to 12 were compared with those on CPAP. In the group (N = 17) who were not successfully weaned, VO2 and VCO2 increased 8 +/- 10 percent and 6 +/- 9 percent, respectively, while PaCO2 rose (37.9 +/- 4 to 42.5 +/- 2.9) significantly (p less than 0.02). There was a significantly greater decrease (15 +/- 3 percent) in VE than in the other group. Changes in VO2 or VCO2 did not aid in predicting which patients would be successfully weaned.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Chest Physicians.