Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ballard, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ballard, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. J.
(Chest. 1988;93:128-133.)
© 1988 American College of Chest Physicians

Estimates of Ventilation from Inductance Plethysmography in Sleeping Asthmatic Patients

Robert D. Ballard M.D.1; Patricia L. Kelly B.A.1; and Richard J. Martin M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 From the Department of Medicine, National Jewish Center for Immunology, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver

To assess the accuracy of the respiratory inductance plethysmograph (RIP) for monitoring ventilation during sleep-associated bronchoconstriction, five adult patients with nocturnal worsening of their asthma were monitored overnight in the sleep laboratory. Three of the five patients demonstrated episodic paradoxic respiratory motion of the lower rib cage undetected by the RIP. Such paradoxic motion was consistently associated with overestimation of volumetric data by RIP compared to pneumotachygraphic measurements. With onset of lower rib cage paradox, the mean error of RIP-derived VT measurements increased from 9.1±1.7 to 27.9±3.8 percent (p<.001). Flow measurements derived from RIP were also inaccurate in the presence of lower rib cage paradox, with the mean error of the measurement increasing from 9.0±2.5 to 33.5±5.3 percent (p<.001). We conclude that RIP is an unreliable technique for quantitatively monitoring ventilation in sleeping asthmatic patients.

Submitted on April 27, 2007
Accepted on June 16, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Chest Physicians.