|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1 From the Department of Medicine, National Jewish Center for Immunology, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver
To assess the accuracy of the respiratory inductance plethysmograph (RIP) for monitoring ventilation during sleep-associated bronchoconstriction, five adult patients with nocturnal worsening of their asthma were monitored overnight in the sleep laboratory. Three of the five patients demonstrated episodic paradoxic respiratory motion of the lower rib cage undetected by the RIP. Such paradoxic motion was consistently associated with overestimation of volumetric data by RIP compared to pneumotachygraphic measurements. With onset of lower rib cage paradox, the mean error of RIP-derived VT measurements increased from 9.1±1.7 to 27.9±3.8 percent (p<.001). Flow measurements derived from RIP were also inaccurate in the presence of lower rib cage paradox, with the mean error of the measurement increasing from 9.0±2.5 to 33.5±5.3 percent (p<.001). We conclude that RIP is an unreliable technique for quantitatively monitoring ventilation in sleeping asthmatic patients.
Submitted on April 27, 2007
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |